USE OF SYMMETRIC DIMETHYLARGININE TO DETECT RENAL LESIONS IN FISH: A PRELIMINARY STUDY IN BROOK TROUT (SALVELINUS FONTINALIS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is an early marker for renal lesions in mammals. The objectives of this study were 1) to establish a reference interval of SDMA in healthy brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill, 1814), and 2) to assess its sensibility as a marker of renal pathology. Plasma SDMA was quantified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in 25 adult brook trout, including 20 fish displaying no renal histologic lesions, and five fish displaying chronic nonactive microscopic granulomas. The fish size (P = 0.30) and weight (P = 0.12) were not statistically different among groups, nor were SDMA values (P = 0.22). However, brook trout without microscopic renal lesions tended to have lower SDMA values (no lesions: mean = 24.9 µg/dL; lesions: mean = 31.4 µg/dL). The reference interval (90% confidence interval [90% CI]) for SDMA concentration in brook trout ranged between 10.0 µg/dL (90% CI: 5.4–14.7) and 39.8 µg/dL (90% CI: 34.8–43.9). These values were higher than those previously reported in other vertebrate species. Further research is needed to evaluate the use of SDMA as a marker of renal function in fishes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".