A copula-based set-variant association test for bivariate continuous or mixed phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In genome wide association studies (GWAS), researchers are often dealing with non-normally distributed traits or a mixture of discrete-continuous traits. However, most of the current region-based methods rely on multivariate linear mixed models (mvLMMs) and assume a multivariate normal distribution for the phenotypes of interest. Hence, these methods are not applicable to disease or non-normally distributed traits. Therefore, there is a need to develop unified and flexible methods to study association between a set of (possibly rare) genetic variants and non-normal multivariate phenotypes. Copulas are multivariate distribution functions with uniform margins on the $[0, 1]$ interval and they provide suitable models to deal with non-normality of errors in multivariate association studies. We propose a novel unified and flexible Copula-Based Multivariate Association Test (CBMAT) for discovering association between a genetic region and a bivariate continuous or mixed phenotype. We also derive a data-driven analytic p-value procedure of the proposed region-based score-type test. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that CBMAT has well controlled type I error rates and higher power to detect associations compared with other existing methods, for discrete and non-normally distributed traits. At last, we apply CBMAT to detect the association between two genes located on chromosome 11 and several lipid levels measured on 1,477 subjects from the ASLPAC study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".