MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203505075 · doi:10.1159/000518501

Beyond Bone Mineral Density: The Impact of Childhood Cancer and Its Treatment on Bone Structure and Strength

2021· review· en· W3203505075 on OpenAlexafffund
Mélissa Fiscaletti, Nathalie Alos, Leanne M. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers of hormone research · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineEpiphysisBone mineralScoliosisDeformitySurgeryOsteoporosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spectrum of bone morbidity in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) is broad and extends beyond "low bone mineral density" to structural damage including fracture-induced vertebral deformity, and joint collapse due to osteonecrosis or slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In addition, short stature, scoliosis, leg length discrepancy, and vertebral deformity can arise from critical interference with growth plate activity. In some cases, insufficient residual growth potential or irreversible growth plate damage can lead to permanent structural deformity, leaving the patient with chronic functional limitations. In this chapter, we describe the clinical manifestations, natural history, and risk factors for cancer-related bone morbidity, approaches to monitoring and diagnosis, and the (paucity of) data available on prevention and treatment measures. In so doing, we unveil important biological principles about the potential for the pediatric skeleton to recover from bone morbidity, obviating the need for treatment, versus permanent structural damage that can negatively impact quality of life over the long-term. These observations, in turn, illuminate the unmet needs that drive future research to improve musculoskeletal strength and mobility in this setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers of hormone researchSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207