MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203514382

Peatlands in a eutrophic world - assessing the state of a poor fen-bog transition in southern Ontario, Canada, after long term nutrient input and altered hydrological conditions

2017· article· en· W3203514382 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sina Berger, Gerhard Gebauer, Christian Blodau, Klaus‐Holger Knorr

Bibliographic record

VenueEGUGA · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatOmbrotrophicBogEnvironmental scienceNutrientEutrophicationMireWetlandHydrology (agriculture)GraminoidVegetation (pathology)Water tableEcologyEcological successionGeologyPlant communityGroundwaterBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Excessive nutrient supply may threaten the carbon storage function of nutrient limited peatlands. We conducted a detailed study in a bog ecosystem (Wylde Lake peatland, Canada), which was once ombrotrophic and since AD 1954 borders a water reservoir, which is enriched with nutrients. Our objective was to elucidate whether the inner peatland parts maintain typical characteristics of a pristine bog. To achieve this goal, along a transect of study sites, we dated peat cores, determined nutrient concentrations and N input and mapped the vegetation. The peatland's central part showed large N input rates of ∼4.3 g N•m −2 •y −1 , but even greater rates of 5.90 ± 0.10 g N•m −2 •y −1 , were found in the periphery. Elements essential for plant growth, such as N, P, S, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn were increased in concentration upwards in the profile of all peat cores, especially near the reservoir, presumably due to supply by the reservoir water. Also, a more graminoid dominated vegetation near the reservoir indicated a transformation of the once ombrotrophic bog into a poor fen. To our surprise and in contrast to previous studies the peatland did not seem to decay after long-term excessive nutrient load, instead it accelerated peat accumulation, leading to maximum growth rates of up to 500 g C•m −2 •y −1 immediately after flooding of the reservoir. Peatland functioning in terms of carbon storage appeared maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGUGASame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207