Biochemical Effect of Low-Level Radiation on Human Beings Examined by Directly Attached Radioactive Mineral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we have reported the clinical significance of low-level radiation and also demonstrated the necessity to determine the threshold of radioactive levels in human beings. In the present study, apart from the direct exposure of alpha-ray with oral intake of radon222 dissolved water or inhaling radon222 gas, the experimental direct exposure to beta- and gamma-rays by wearing a cotton sack containing Samarskite with direct contact to skin for one month was conducted. The average of beta- and gamma-ray levels on the sack surface was approximately 400 μSV/hour. The biochemical laboratory tests involving immunological markers were assessed at the initial and end points. In this study, the partial but continual direct exposure of human body to beta- and gamma-rays for one month showed no harmful effects. There are no significant changes in any of the bio markers. Although this study is limited regarding the number of subjects, the procedure is quite simple; thus, the gathering data using this procedure by adjusting the types and levels of radioactivity would be helpful in finding out the accurate radioactive threshold in human beings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".