MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203579844 · doi:10.1109/aces53325.2021.00057

AI-Driven Wireless Propagation Models and Applications

2021· article· en· W3203579844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceComputationElectromagneticsBackpropagationRadio propagationWirelessRadio propagation modelComputational electromagneticsRay tracing (physics)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectromagnetic fieldPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are presenting examples of artificial intelligence enabled algorithms for radiowave propagation modeling and their application to practical problems of interests. We use computational electromagnetics techniques to generate physics-based training data for neural networks. Emphasis is given on ray-tracing and the vector parabolic equation method, for indoor and tunnel propagation problems, respectively. For the latter, the use of artificial neural networks for the efficient computation of uncertainties inherent in propagation models is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it