Bibliographic record
Abstract
These are bright days for the Edinburgh International Film Festival. Its new artistic director is Hannah McGill, a sometime contributor to this magazine and therfore a faultless choice. Debutting in the year after the event's 60th anniversary, she has made it a priority to consolidate Edinburgh's long-help position as a major international talent-magnet in an ever more competitive festival scene. She has brought youthful zest to the August event with an eclectic programme likely to please all comers, and with a suitably Scottish opening-night winner in Hallam Foe (right). Others standouts are covered overleaf, including Gus Van Sant's Paranoid Park, a portrait of a skater boy in trouble shot by the inimitable Christopher Doyle. 'Cinema and the Written Word' is a strand dedicated to the craft of the screenwriter, not least among whom is Anita Loos, the subject of this year's retrospective. Loos is best known as the author of the flapper novel Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, but she was also a prolific writer of screenplays in the silent era. On this form, McGill will soon find her own place on high in Halam Foe's city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".