Islamic financial institutions: Performance comparison with Canadian banks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian financial market is considered to be very conservative and has been using the same practices for a long time. The economies of some countries such as England have adopted a strategy of including Islamic finance in their market and this has produced very satisfactory results. Considering that Islamic finance has been growing in recent years, this type of practice could be relevant to the Canadian market. The objective of this article is to analyze whether the performance of Islamic financial institutions is comparable to traditional banks. A comparison of the efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks will be important to determine because they do not operate in the same way and their primary source of income is different. The results revealed that Islamic banks tended to perform better than conventional banks. Performance ratios were in most cases higher for Islamic banks. This observation was confirmed with the use of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, which measures efficiency and effectiveness at the bank level. The results show that although some Islamic banks had significantly fewer assets than conventional banks, they were still able to use resources more efficiently. This confirmed that Islamic finance is an option for Canada and that with government support it will be possible to have a stronger economy overall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".