Convex Relaxations of Integral Variational Problems: Pointwise Dual Relaxation and Sum-of-Squares Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a method for finding lower bounds on the global infima of integral variational problems, wherein $\int_\Omega f(x,u(x),\nabla u(x)){\rm d}x$ is minimized over functions $u\colon\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^m$ satisfying given equality or inequality constraints. Each constraint may be imposed over $\Omega$ or its boundary, either pointwise or in an integral sense. These global minimizations are generally non-convex and intractable. We formulate a particular convex maximization, here called the pointwise dual relaxation (PDR), whose supremum is a lower bound on the infimum of the original problem. The PDR can be derived by dualizing and relaxing the original problem; its constraints are pointwise equalities or inequalities over finite-dimensional sets, rather than over infinite-dimensional function spaces. When the original minimization can be specified by polynomial functions of $(x,u,\nabla u)$, the PDR can be further relaxed by replacing pointwise inequalities with polynomial sum-of-squares (SOS) conditions. The resulting SOS program is computationally tractable when the dimensions $m,n$ and number of constraints are not too large. The framework presented here generalizes an approach of Valmorbida, Ahmadi, and Papachristodoulou (IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 61:1649--1654, 2016). We prove that the optimal lower bound given by the PDR is sharp for several classes of problems, whose special cases include leading eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems and optimal constants of Poincar\'e inequalities. For these same classes, we prove that SOS relaxations of the PDR converge to the sharp lower bound as polynomial degrees are increased. Convergence of SOS computations in practice is illustrated for several examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it