Real-Time Multi-Level Neonatal Heart and Lung Sound Quality Assessment for Telehealth Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a new method is proposed to assess heart and lung signal quality objectively and automatically on a 5-level scale in real-time, and to assess the effect of signal quality on vital sign estimation. A total of 207 10 s long chest sounds were taken from 119 preterm and full-term babies. Thirty of the recordings from ten subjects were obtained with synchronous vital signs from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). As a reference, seven annotators independently assessed the signal quality. For automatic quality classification, 400 features were extracted from the chest sounds. After feature ranking and selection, class balancing, and hyperparameter optimization, a variety of multi-class and ordinal classification and regression algorithms were trained. Then, heart rate and breathing rate were automatically estimated from the chest sounds. For the deep learning model, YAMNet, a deep convolutional neural network pre-trained on the AudioSet-Youtube corpus for sound classification was used. After modification of the final output layers of the neural network and class balancing, transfer learning was applied to YAMNet for heart and lung signal quality classification. The results of subject-wise leave-one-out cross-validation show that the best-performing models had a balanced accuracy of 56.8% and 51.2% for heart and lung qualities, respectively. The best-performing models for real-time analysis (< 200 ms) had a balanced accuracy of 56.7% and 46.3%, respectively. Our experimental results underscore that increasing the signal quality leads to a reduction in vital sign error.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".