Characterization of a carbonate geothermal reservoir using rock-physics-guided deep neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Deep neural networks (DNNs) have the potential to streamline the integration of seismic data for reservoir characterization by providing estimates of rock properties that are directly interpretable by geologists and reservoir engineers instead of elastic attributes like most standard seismic inversion methods. However, they have yet to be applied widely in the energy industry because training DNNs requires a large amount of labeled data that is rarely available. Training set augmentation, routinely used in other scientific fields such as image recognition, can address this issue and open the door to DNNs for geophysical applications. Although this approach has been explored in the past, creating realistic synthetic well and seismic data representative of the variable geology of a reservoir remains challenging. Recently introduced theory-guided techniques can help achieve this goal. A key step in these hybrid techniques is the use of theoretical rock-physics models to derive elastic pseudologs from variations of existing petrophysical logs. Rock-physics theories are already commonly relied on to generalize and extrapolate the relationship between rock and elastic properties. Therefore, they are a useful tool to generate a large catalog of alternative pseudologs representing realistic geologic variations away from the existing well locations. While not directly driven by rock physics, neural networks trained on such synthetic catalogs extract the intrinsic rock-physics relationships and are therefore capable of directly estimating rock properties from seismic amplitudes. Neural networks trained on purely synthetic data are applied to a set of 2D poststack seismic lines to characterize a geothermal reservoir located in the Dogger Formation northeast of Paris, France. The goal of the study is to determine the extent of porous and permeable layers encountered at existing geothermal wells and ultimately guide the location and design of future geothermal wells in the area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".