TOWARDS THE AUTOMATIC ONTOLOGY GENERATION AND ALIGNMENT OF BIM AND GIS DATA FORMATS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Establishing semantic interoperability between BIM and GIS is vital for geospatial information exchange. Semantic web have a natural ability to provide seamless semantic representation and integration among the heterogeneous domains like BIM and GIS through employing ontology. Ontology models can be defined (or generated) using domain-data representations and further aligned across other ontologies by the semantic similarity of their entities - introducing cross-domain ontologies to achieve interoperability of heterogeneous information. However, due to extensive semantic features and complex alignment (mapping) relations between BIM and GIS data formats, many approaches are far from generating semantically-rich ontologies and perform effective alignment to address geospatial interoperability. This study highlights the fundamental perspectives to be addressed for BIM and GIS interoperability and proposes a comprehensive conceptual framework for automatic ontology generation followed by ontology alignment of open-standards for BIM and GIS data formats. It presents an approach based on transformation patterns to automatically generate ontology models, and semantic-based and structure-based alignment techniques to form cross-domain ontology. Proposed two-phase framework provides ontology model generation for input XML schemas (i.e. of IFC and CityGML formats), and illustrates alignment technique to potentially develop a cross-domain ontology. The study concludes anticipated results of cross-domain ontology can provides future perspectives in knowledge-discovery applications and seamless information exchange for BIM and GIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".