Memory and Its Entanglements: A Psychoanalytic Meditation on Terror and Aftermath
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The global psychological impact of the events of September 11, 2001 are extremely difficult to measure statistically, and impossible for any one researcher to accomplish successfully. The narrower focus that the study of a few cases can offer, while less ambitious, can find, perhaps in depth, what it lacks in scope. In that spirit, this essay focuses on four individuals, two children and two adults and their distinctly individual reactions. One finding of such an impressionistic study is that it is quite difficult to separate the impact of one specific trauma from other developmental or psychoanalytic factors, which will come as no surprise to students of development or psychoanalysis. That said, the four individuals studied in this essay manage trauma in their own unique ways, suggesting that while trauma can challenge and impinge on character it cannot anticipate the resilience that redresses it with as many strategies as there are individual minds to deploy them. The four clinical descriptions in this essay emphasize this point in a graphic manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".