Growth and development of trabecular structure in the calcaneus of Japanese macaques ( <i>Macaca fuscata</i> ) reflects locomotor behavior, life-history, and neuromuscular development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We aim to broaden the analysis of bone structure by suggesting a new way to incorporate the interactions between behavior, neuromuscular development, and life-history. We examine the associations between these variables and age-related variation in trabecular structure in the calcaneus of Japanese macaques ( Macaca fuscata ). If skeletal markers linking these variables can be established, our inferences of the biology and behavior of fossil species would be significantly improved. We µCT scanned the calcaneus in a cross-sectional sample of 36 juveniles aged between 0 and 7 years old and 5 adults at the Primate Research Institute, Japan. We calculated whole bone averages of standard trabecular properties and generated whole-bone morphometric maps of bone volume fraction and Young’s modulus. Trabecular structure is increasingly heterogeneous in older individuals. BV/TV decreases during the first month of life and increases afterwards, coinciding with the onset of independent locomotion. At birth, primary Young’s modulus is oriented orthogonal to the ossification center, but after locomotor onset bone structure becomes stiffest in the direction of joint surfaces and muscle attachments. Age-related variation in bone volume fraction is best predicted by an interaction between neuromaturation, body mass, and locomotor independence. Results support the common assumption that trabecular structure dynamically adapts to novel joint loading conditions during ontogeny. The timing of independent locomotion, body size, and neuromuscular development, are all correlated to age-related variation in the trabecular structure of the macaque calcaneus. The causal mechanisms behind the observed patterns cannot be directly inferred from our cross-sectional study. If the model presented in this paper holds up under longitudinal experimental conditions, trabecular structure can be used both to infer behavior from fossil morphology and to serve as a valuable proxy for neuromuscular maturation and life history events like locomotor onset and the achievement of an adult-like gait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".