Modèle humanimal de pratique en médiation animale – zoothérapie. Où mettre nos pas dans l’empreinte de leurs pattes ouvre sur de nouveaux possibles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans certaines pratiques anthropocentrées en médiation animale, l’animal non-humain est encore considéré comme un « outil au service de l’Homme » plutôt qu’un partenaire à l’intervention. Cette instrumentalisation le met à risque de vivre de l’abus en plus de possiblement limiter la portée de l’intervention. La reconnaissance de l’agentivité de l’animal non-humain semble donc nécessaire pour libérer le véritable potentiel et ainsi accéder à la richesse de la médiation animale. À l’aide d’illustrations cliniques, l’auteur présente le Modèle humanimal de pratique en médiation animale – zoothérapie qu’elle a développé, un dispositif permettant d’embrasser ce changement de paradigme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".