MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203831328 · doi:10.1111/dth.15156

Successful follicular unit extraction in a case of inactive, recalcitrant alopecia barbae

2021· article· en· W3203831328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologic Therapy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAlopecia areataScarring alopeciaDermatologyAlopecia universalisBiopsyHair lossHistopathologyHair transplantationHair follicleFollicular phaseSurgeryScalpPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring autoimmune type of alopecia. Hair transplantation in AA is not practiced as the implanted follicular grafts might be destroyed due to underlying autoimmune pathology. A biopsy proven 28 year old male patient of AA presented to us with an 8-year history of a hairless patch over the beard area. He underwent many treatments by other dermatologist with oral, topical, and intralesional immunosuppressants, which curtailed his disease progression but failed to re-grow hair. Biopsy during his visit revealed absence of inflammatory infiltrates and empty hair tracts replaced by fibrotic tracts. Follicular unit extraction (FUE) was done successfully after counseling the patient about the controversial role of hair transplant surgery in AA. Hair growth was achieved within 6 months with no recurrence during 1-year follow up. FUE can be opted for long-standing and clinically stable cases of AA; histopathology and dermoscopy being the guiding lights in determining the disease inactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it