High-Performance Discriminative Tracking with Transformers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
End-to-end discriminative trackers improve the state of the art significantly, yet the improvement in robustness and efficiency is restricted by the conventional discriminative model, i.e., least-squares based regression. In this paper, we present DTT, a novel single-object discriminative tracker, based on an encoder-decoder Transformer architecture. By self- and encoder-decoder attention mechanisms, our approach is able to exploit the rich scene information in an end-to-end manner, effectively removing the need for hand-designed discriminative models. In online tracking, given a new test frame, dense prediction is performed at all spatial positions. Not only location, but also bounding box of the target object is obtained in a robust fashion, streamlining the discriminative tracking pipeline. DTT is conceptually simple and easy to implement. It yields state-of-the-art performance on four popular benchmarks including GOT-10k, LaSOT, NfS, and TrackingNet while running at over 50 FPS, confirming its effectiveness and efficiency. We hope DTT may provide a new perspective for single-object visual tracking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".