High-Performance Discriminative Tracking with Transformers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
End-to-end discriminative trackers improve the state of the art significantly, yet the improvement in robustness and efficiency is restricted by the conventional discriminative model, i.e., least-squares based regression. In this paper, we present DTT, a novel single-object discriminative tracker, based on an encoder-decoder Transformer architecture. By self- and encoder-decoder attention mechanisms, our approach is able to exploit the rich scene information in an end-to-end manner, effectively removing the need for hand-designed discriminative models. In online tracking, given a new test frame, dense prediction is performed at all spatial positions. Not only location, but also bounding box of the target object is obtained in a robust fashion, streamlining the discriminative tracking pipeline. DTT is conceptually simple and easy to implement. It yields state-of-the-art performance on four popular benchmarks including GOT-10k, LaSOT, NfS, and TrackingNet while running at over 50 FPS, confirming its effectiveness and efficiency. We hope DTT may provide a new perspective for single-object visual tracking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it