Bibliographic record
Abstract
BPS: In my view, the last session was the most interesting from a legislative process in over a decade.KG: Mine too, and I've been there for a decade.BPS: It's the first time I have seen since the bell ringing crisis where the Opposition significantly alter the train going down the track in terms of the government passing its legislation.KG: I think it was the longest spring session in the history of the Manitoba Legislature.BPS: Quite remarkable.It raises the question, it is something that we've noticed with Underneath the Golden Boy the fact that what goes on inside the Legislature often does not resonate outside the Legislature.So you put a tremendous amount of energy into putting together speeches, coming up with the hard questions, coming up with a snappy response.There was a time when 15 to 20 reporters covering the Legislature.Now you have barely any.Is that something you feel frustration about?KG: I do in the sense that what happens at the Legislature is really important, not just from the financial perspective although there is a lot of money that gets spent in terms of bills and the budget, but it is important from a democratic perspective.Every bill passed has some impact on somebody, and often people don't hear about these pieces of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".