MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203940338 · doi:10.3917/cdlj.2102.0297

Filmer les procès pour l'histoire : la fabrique d'une archive de la justice

2021· article· fr· W3203940338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Justice · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLegal Systems and Institutions
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La loi Badinter du 11 juillet 1985 a permis de créer de façon volontaire 14 archives audiovisuelles de procès promues au rang de documents pour l'Histoire. Dérogatoire à l'interdiction de capter les audiences de la loi sur la liberté de la presse, exception au régime général des archives, cette mise en archives de la Justice sélectionne quelques procès pour l'exemple et pour la mémoire de la Justice. Une archiviste et un historien reviennent sur 35 ans d'une présence rare de la caméra dans le prétoire, afin d'éclairer les modalités de ces captations entre cadre réglementaire, exigence de la pérennisation des archives et besoins présumés de l'historien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it