Il Volto Pubblico Dell'Ingiustizia: Attivismo Indigeno E Insurrezioni Dei Tuareg in Mali (The Public Face of Injustice: Indigenous Activism and Tuareg Insurrections in Mali)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Italian Abstract: Questo saggio considera la contraddizione tra due strategie verso l'autonomia regionale dei tuareg nel Sahara centrale. I rappresentanti dei tuareg hanno partecipato attivamente al coinvolgimento dei popoli africani nei forum indigeni sui diritti umani a partire dalla meta degli anni '90. Allo stesso tempo, l'occupazione del Mali settentrionale nel 2012 e nel 2013 da parte di una coalizione di gruppi tuareg che perseguivano l'autonomia regionale attraverso il Mouvement National pour la Liberation de Azawad (MNLA), i cui sforzi erano associati ad elementi di Al-Qaida al Maghreb Islamique (AQMI), ha presentato al mondo una strategia molto diversa verso il riconoscimento dei diritti e l'autonomia regionale, una prontamente associata alla violenza, all'intolleranza stridente e, con il saccheggio delle famose biblioteche di Timbuktu, alla distruzione sfrenata del patrimonio mondiale. Questa situazione solleva una serie di domande: come e possibile l'attuazione dei diritti umani laddove i diritti abbiano una valuta scarsa o incoerente tra i potenziali richiedenti di diritti? Oltre a questo, in che modo, in lotte moralmente complesse per la giustizia, sono alcuni stati in grado di sfruttare l'apatia dei pubblici in modi che sistematicamente, e talvolta egregiamente, violano gli standard internazionali di giustizia? English Abstract: This paper considers the contradiction between two strategies toward regional autonomy by Tuaregs in the central Sahara. Tuareg representatives have been active participants in African peoples’ involvement in indigenous human rights forums starting in the mid-1990s. At the same time, the occupation of northern Mali in 2012 and 2013 by a loose coalition of Tuareg groups pursuing regional autonomy through the Mouvement National pour la Liberation de Azawad (MNLA), whose efforts were associated with elements of Al-Qaida au Maghreb Islamique (AQMI), presented to the world a very different strategy toward recognition of rights and regional autonomy, one readily associated with violence, strident intolerance, and, with the pillaging of the famous libraries of Timbuktu, with wanton destruction of world heritage. This situation raises a number of questions: How is the implementation of human rights possible where those rights have little, or inconsistent, currency among the potential rights claimants? Further to this, how, in morally complex struggles for justice, are some states able to exploit the apathy of publics in ways that systematically, and at times egregiously, violate international justice standards?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".