MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204044690 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v74i4.3194

Stability of Extemporaneously Compounded Suspensions of Trimethoprim and Sulfamethoxazole in Amber Plastic Bottles and Amber Plastic Syringes

2021· article· en· W3204044690 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Isabelle St‐Jean, Mihaela Friciu, Anaëlle Monfort, Jessica MacMahon, Jean‐Marc Forest, Scott E. Walker, Grégoire Leclair

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversité de MontréalSunnybrook Health Science CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfamethoxazoleTrimethoprimChemistryAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) are widely used, in combination, to treat or prevent various infections. Unfortunately, no liquid oral formulation is currently available in Canada for patients who are unable to swallow tablets. Objective: To evaluate the stability of suspensions of TMP and SMX (8 and 40 mg/mL, respectively) prepared in Oral Mix or Oral Mix SF vehicle (Medisca Pharmaceutique Inc) and stored for up to 90 days in amber plastic bottles or amber plastic syringes at 5°C or 25°C. Methods: Suspensions were prepared from bulk powder and from tablets in Oral Mix and Oral Mix SF vehicles, then transferred to amber plastic (polyethylene terephthalate glycol) bottles and plastic oral syringes and stored at 5°C and 25°C. Samples were collected on predetermined study days (0, 7, 14, 23, 45, 60, 75, and 90 days) and analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography – ultraviolet detection method. A suspension was considered stable if it maintained at least 90% of its initial concentration with 95% confidence. Observations of organoleptic characteristics such as colour and odour, as well as pH, were used to assess physical stability. Results: Suspensions prepared from bulk powder maintained concentrations of TMP and SMX of at least 97% of the initial concentration over the 90-day study period. No obvious changes in colour, odour, or pH were observed. However, acceptable suspensions could not be prepared from the commercial tablets. A persistent foam that developed at the surface of all suspensions prepared from tablets could result in inconsistent dosing. Conclusions: Extemporaneously compounded oral suspensions of TMP and SMX (8 and 40 mg/mL, respectively) prepared from bulk powder in Oral Mix and Oral Mix SF vehicles and stored in amber plastic bottles or syringes at 5°C or 25°C remained stable for at least 90 days. Suspensions made from tablets produced unacceptable formulations. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : Le triméthoprime (TMP) et le sulfaméthoxazole (SMX) sont largement utilisés conjointement pour traiter ou prévenir diverses infections. Malheureusement, aucune formulation liquide orale n’est actuellement disponible au Canada pour les patients incapables d’avaler des comprimés. Objectif : Évaluer la stabilité des suspensions de TMP et de SMX (respectivement 8 et 40 mg/mL) préparées dans un véhicule Oral Mix ou Oral Mix SF (Medisca Pharmaceutique Inc.) et stockées pendant 90 jours dans des flacons ou des seringues en plastique ambré à 5 °C ou 25 °C. Méthodes : Les suspensions ont été préparées à partir de poudre en vrac et de comprimés dans les véhicules Oral Mix et Oral Mix SF, puis transférées dans des flacons en plastique ambré (polyéthylène téréphtalate glycol) et dans des seringues orales en plastique et stockées à 5 °C et 25 °C. Des échantillons ont été recueillis à des jours prédéterminés (0, 7, 14, 23, 45, 60, 75 et 90 jours) et analysés à l’aide d’une méthode de détection par ultraviolet validée de chromatographie en phase liquide à haute performance. La suspension était jugée stable si elle préservait au moins 90 % de sa concentration initiale avec un seuil de confiance de 95 %. Les observations des caractéristiques organoleptiques, comme la couleur et l’odeur, ainsi que le pH, ont été faites pour évaluer la stabilité physique. Résultats : Les suspensions préparées à partir de poudre en vrac préservaient au moins 97 % de la concentration initiale de TMP et de SMX pendant la période d’étude de 90 jours. Aucun changement manifeste de couleur, d’odeur ou de pH n’a été observé. Cependant, les suspensions acceptables n’ont pas pu être préparées à partir des comprimés commerciaux. Une mousse homogène se formait à la surface de ces suspensions, ce qui pourrait entraîner un dosage incohérent. Conclusions : Les suspensions orales composées extemporanées de TMP et SMX (respectivement 8 et 40 mg/mL) préparées à partir de poudre en vrac dans des véhicules Oral Mix et Oral Mix SF et stockées dans des flacons ou des seringues en plastique ambré à 5 °C ou 25°C sont restées stables pendant au moins 90 jours. Les suspensions préparées à partir de comprimés ont donné des formulations inacceptables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsFrench-language works237,207