MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204060111 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.2021.11

Ned Land et l’utopie compensatoire chez Jules Verne: à propos du Canadien de <i>Vingt Mille Lieues sous les mers</i>

2021· article· fr· W3204060111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maxime Prévost

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jules Verne, qui appelait le Canada ‘mon pays de prédilection’, a écrit trois romans canadiens et donné jour à de forts personnages-types canadiens dans ses Voyages extraordinaires. Le mieux connu de ces personnages est Ned Land, l’intrépide harponneur de Vingt Mille Lieues sous les mers, personnage composite des identités française et anglaise, le Verne de 1869 voyant le Canada de l’immédiate post-confédération comme le lieu de la conciliation franco-anglaise. Ned Land se distingue par son amour de la liberté: au fil des décennies, Verne, endossant désormais les récriminations de l’opinion française contre les ‘Anglo-Saxons’, fera de cette caractéristique celle de tous les Franco-Canadiens, son roman Famille-sans-nom (1889) présentant cette fois l’utopie compensatoire (à savoir cette propension vernienne à faire du Canada le lieu de représentations idéalisées allant à l’encontre de l’histoire événementielle) d’une union entre Canadiens français et peuples autochtones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207