Numerical study of a blind bolted connection between an aluminum bridge deck and steel girders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>This article concerns the behaviour of two blind bolt types, Ajax One side and Blind Oversize Mechanically (BOM), used to connect a multi-void aluminum bridge deck on its supporting steel girders. An extensive numerical simulation by FEM was performed to evaluate the connection behaviour against the Canadian Highway Bridge Design standard CSA S6-19. The main objective was to examine the assembly against fretting and quantify its impact at the contact zone over several load cycles. A special numerical model was developed for the prediction of fretting, and validated with analytical results and other observations reported in the literature. The model was used to analyze the fretting for each bolt at the surface of contact between the bolt head and the aluminum plate. Results of the study revealed that the blind bolts will lead to a few micrometers of wear, while for the standard bolt, a probable crack developments associated with minor wear may occur at the contact area.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it