MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3204082626 · doi:10.1101/2021.09.30.462489

Large-scale comparative genomics of <i>Salmonella enterica</i> to refine the organization of the global <i>Salmonella</i> population structure

2021· preprint· en· W3204082626 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Chun Liu, William Hsiao

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPolyphylySalmonella entericaSerotypeSalmonellaGeneticsPopulationMultilocus sequence typingTypingIn silicoComparative genomicsGenomeGenomicsEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyPhylogeneticsVirologyGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Abstract Since the introduction of the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor (WKL) scheme for Salmonella serotyping, the nomenclature remains the most widely used for reporting the disease prevalence of Salmonella enterica across the globe. With the advent of whole genome sequencing (WGS), traditional serotyping has been increasingly replaced by in-silico methods that couple the detection of genetic variations in antigenic determinants with sequence-based typing. However, despite the integration of genomic-based typing by in-silico serotyping tools such as SeqSero2 and SISTR, in-silico serotyping in certain contexts remains ambiguous and insufficiently informative due to polyphyletic serovars. Furthermore, in spite of the widespread acknowledgement of polyphyly from genomic studies, the serotyping nomenclature remains unaltered. To prompt refinements to the Salmonella typing nomenclature for disease reporting, we herein performed a systematic characterization of putative polyphyletic serovars and the global Salmonella population structure by comparing 180,098 Salmonella genomes (representing 723 predicted serovars) from GenomeTrakr and PubMLST databases. We identified a range of core genome MLST typing thresholds that result in stable population structure, potentially suitable as the foundation of a genomic-based typing nomenclature for longitudinal surveillance. From the genomic comparisons of hundreds of predicted serovars, we demonstrated that in-silico serotyping classifications do not consistently reflect the population divergence observed at the genomic level. The organization of Salmonella subpopulations based on antigenic determinants can be confounded by homologous recombination and niche adaptation, resulting in shared classification of highly divergent genomes and misleading distinction between highly similar genomes. In consideration of the pivotal role of Salmonella serotyping, a compendium of putative polyphyletic serovars was compiled and made publicly available to provide additional context for future interpretations of in-silico serotyping results in disease surveillance settings. To refine the typing nomenclatures used in Salmonella surveillance reports, we foresee an improved typing scheme to be a hybrid that integrates both genomic and antigenic information such that the resolution from WGS is leveraged to improve the precision of subpopulation classifications while preserving the common names defined by the WKL scheme. Lastly, we stress the importance of controlled vocabulary integration for typing information in open data settings in order for the global Salmonella population dynamics to be fully trackable. 2. Impact Statement Salmonella enterica ( S. enterica ) is a major foodborne pathogen responsible for an annual incidence rate of more than 90 million cases of foodborne illnesses worldwide. To surveil the high order Salmonella lineages, compare disease prevalence across jurisdictions worldwide, and inform risk assessments, in-silico serotyping has been established as the gold standard for typing the bacteria. However, despite previous Salmonella genomic studies reporting discordance between phylogenomic clades and serovars, refinements have yet been made to the serotyping scheme. Here, we analyzed over 180,000 Salmonella genomes representing 723 predicted serovars to subdivide the population into evolutionarily stable clusters in order to propose a stable organization of the Salmonella population structure that can form the basis of a genomic-based typing scheme for the pathogen. We described numerous instances in which genomes between serotypes are more similar than genomes within a serotype to reflect the inconsistencies of subpopulation classifications based on antigenic determinants. Moreover, we found inconsistencies between predicted serovars and reported serovars which highlighted potential errors in existing in-silico serotyping tools and the need to implement controlled vocabularies for reporting Salmonella subtypes in public databases. The findings of our study aim to motivate the future development of a standardized genomic-based typing nomenclature that more accurately captures the natural populations of S. enterica . 3. Data Summary The assembly accession numbers of the genomes analyzed in this study (n = 204,952) and the associated metadata (e.g. sampling location, collection date, FTP address for retrieval) are documented in Table S1. The GenomeTrakr genomes were retrieved from the National Center for Biological Information GenBank database. The PubMLST genomes were retrieved using the BIGSdb API.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→