Does culture matter? The characteristics of adolescent physical abuse cases investigated by Montreal's English youth protection services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il y a eut maints débats, tant au sein de discussions sociales qu’en recherche, visant à évaluer une potentielle plus grande tolérance pour la discipline physique parmi certains groupe ethnoculturels. Cette étude descriptive a pour but d’examiner les caractéristiques de 72 cas d’abus rapporté au service de protection jeunesse anglais de Montréal sur une période de deux ans. Les résultats révèlent que 49% de ces dits cas impliquaient des enfants provenant de minorités visibles. Deux groupes jeunesses, les minorités visibles et les caucasien furent comparés par l’entremise d’un tri croisé. Certains facteurs tels l’immigration, le stress de l’accommodation culturelle ainsi que l’assujettissement de parents à la correction physique lors de leur enfance furent plus proéminents dans des cas mettant en cause des jeunes de minorités visibles. En contrepartie les cas de problèmes de santé mentale furent plus fréquent dans les cas mettant en cause les jeunes caucasiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".