Flow characteristics analysis for flow past the porous spheres: wake structures and drag force coefficients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flow past a permeable sphere is different from that of a solid sphere due to the penetration of the fluid within porous structures, which can arise a change of flow fields. In this work, flow past porous spheres with Darcy numbers (Da) ranging from [0,10−3 ] were measured using planar Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). The whole flow fields, including both leading edge and trailing edge, were captured at six different Reynolds numbers (Re) varying from 400 to 1400. Time-average flow fields were calculated based on instantaneous flow fields within fully-developed stages. Local minimum method was used to search for stagnation point positions. The results show positions of stagnation points are nearly proportional to the logarithm of Re. For most porous spheres, positions of stagnation points are extended to farther downstream positions than that of a solid sphere. However, at some certain Darcy numbers, ranging from 5 ∗ 10−6 to 2 ∗ 10−5, positions of stagnation points are closer to the sphere centers than that of an impermeable one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".