MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204177662 · doi:10.1080/15476278.2021.1936785

Connection of ES Cell-derived Collecting Ducts and Ureter-like Structures to Host Kidneys in Culture

2021· article· en· W3204177662 on OpenAlexfundno aff
May Sallam, Jamie A. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganogenesis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilKidney Research UKYork University
KeywordsUreterConnection (principal bundle)Cell cultureAnatomyBiologyCell biologyMedicineEngineeringSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Work toward renal generation generally aims either to introduce suspensions of stem cells into kidneys in the hope that they will rebuild damaged tissue, or to construct complete new kidneys from stem cells with the aim of transplanting the engineered organs. In principle, there might be a third approach; to engineer renal tissue 'modules' in vitro and to use them to replace sections of damaged host kidney. This approach would require the urine collecting system or ureter of the new tissues to connect to those of the host. In this report, we demonstrate a method that allows collecting duct trees or ureters, engineered from ES cells, to connect to the collecting duct system or ureter, respectively, of fetal kidneys in culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganogenesisSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207