MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204201258 · doi:10.3968/12264

On the “Duration” of Psychological Time in To the Lighthouse

2021· article· en· W3204201258 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lu Qi, Min Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuration (music)ConsciousnessEternityEmbodied cognitionAnguishId, ego and super-egoNarrativePsychoanalysisAestheticsPsychologyRepresentation (politics)ArtPhilosophyLiteratureEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employing Henry Bergson’s theory of “duration” in the analysis of “psychological time” in To the Lighthouse, this article seeks to reveal the temporal scheme of the novel, in which embodied the distinctive aesthetic of “psychological time”, the motif of the essence of life, and the secret of Woolf’s creation of art. In the novel, Mrs. Ramsay found solace and hope for the future when she was immersed in her flowing of consciousness featured by heterogeneous and continuous “duration” of psychological time, while Lily Briscoe, as Woolf’s “artist alter ego,” struggled against the anguish in her duration of psychological time, transforming memory into the art of eternity. With the virtuoso representation of “stream of consciousness,” Woolf amplifies psychological-time narration within the structure of the external “clock time”, uncovering the truth of human consciousness, revealing the connection between the spiritual and the objective world, and exploring the essence of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.025
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicModernist Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207