MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204213912 · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112604

Combination of epigallocatechin gallate with l-cysteine in inhibiting Maillard browning of concentrated orange juice during storage

2021· article· en· W3204213912 on OpenAlexaff
Yangyang Chen, Min Zhang, Arun S. Mujumdar, Yaping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueLWT · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTea Polyphenols and Effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaillard reactionBrowningChemistryFood scienceFlavorEpigallocatechin gallateOrange (colour)Orange juicePolyphenolBiochemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orange juice is popular with consumers because of its unique taste, flavor as well as nutritional value which accounts for a large proportion of the global juice market. Concentrated orange juice (COJ), undergoes browning during storage seriously affecting its quality and commercial. This study was the first to evaluate the effects of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and l-cysteine (L-cys) on Maillard browning of COJ during storage. The results show that EGCG and L-cys reduce significantly the production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), the characteristic product of Maillard reaction (MR), and the combined use of EGCG and L-cys was even more effective. Furthermore, the color of the treated COJ displayed negligible change after storage, with higher L* and b* values and marginally lower a* values. The flavor, taste, main volatile substances as well as rheological properties of the treated COJ were also determined; none of these properties were affected adversely during storage. This treatment method ensures that the key sensory quality and material properties of COJ are preserved by the proposed treatment while inhibiting Maillard browning during storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLWTSame topicTea Polyphenols and EffectsFrench-language works237,207