COVID‐19: Exploring the new normal in insolvency. Edited by Dr Sameer Sharma and Dr Neeti Shikha (eds) (1st edition) (2021, Bloomsbury, New Delhi) 403 pp., INR 699, ISBN 978‐93‐54354‐89‐2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International Insolvency ReviewVolume 30, Issue 3 p. 478-481 BOOK REVIEW COVID-19: Exploring the new normal in insolvency. Dr Sameer Sharma and Dr Neeti Shikha (eds) ( 1st edition) (2021, Bloomsbury, New Delhi) 403 pp., INR 699, ISBN 978-93-54354-89-2 Jennifer L.L Gant, Corresponding Author Jennifer L.L Gant [email protected] College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UKSearch for more papers by this author Jennifer L.L Gant, Corresponding Author Jennifer L.L Gant [email protected] College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 27 September 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1437Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookxLinkedInRedditWechat Volume30, Issue3Winter 2021Pages 478-481 RelatedInformation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".