Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infanzia e storia (1978. Nuova edizione accresciuta, 2001), Giorgio Agamben descrive cosi il compito della letteratura moderna: In Baudelaire, un uomo, che e stato espropriato dell'esperienza, si offre senza alcuno schermo alla ricezione degli choc. All'espropriazione dell'esperienza, la poesia risponde trasformando questa espropriazione in una ragione di sopravvivenza e facendo dell'inesperibile la sua condizione normale. questa prospettiva, la ricerca del 'nuovo' non appare come la ricerca di un nuovo oggetto dell'esperienza, ma implica al contrario, un'eclisse e una dell'esperienza. (Aganben 2001: 38). I concetti fondanti di questo brano sono eclisse e sospensione. Ma che cosa si intende precisamente per sospensione dell'esperienza,e che cosa sono in realta una letteratura e un linguaggio della sospensione? Bibliografia Agamben, G. 2001. Infanzia e storia. Distruzione dell'esperienza e origine della storia . Torino: Einaudi. Agamben, G. 1993. Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience . Trans. Liz Heron. London: Verso. Beckett, S. 1982. Ill Seen Ill Said . London: Calder. Benjamin, W. 2002. The Arcade Project . Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Blanchot, M. 1962. L'attente l'oubli . Paris: Gallimard. Blanchot, M. 1997. Awaiting Oblivion . Trans. John Gregg. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press. Caproni, G. 1998. L'opera in Versi . Luca Zuliani (ed.). Milano: Meridiani mondatori. Caproni, G. 1992. The Wall of the Earth . Trans. Pasquale Verdicchio. Montreal: Guernica. Heidegger, M. 1968. What is Philosophy? . Trans. William Kluback and Jean T. Wilde. London: Vision Press. Munier, R. 1992. Stele pour Heidegger . Paris: Arfuyen. Plato. 1999. The Symposium . Trans. Chtistopher Gill. London: Penguin Books. Plato. 1973. Phaedrus and Letters VII and VIII . Trans. Walter Hamilton. London: Penguin Books.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".