Recovery and mental health: a review of the Latin American literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl enfoque de Recuperacion surgio en la decada de 1970 en los Estados Unidos a partir de movimientos en defensa de los derechos de los usuarios de los servicios de salud mental, ex pacientes o supervivientes de la Psiquiatria. Desde la decada de 2000, la recuperacion ha estado guiando los servicios de salud mental en varios paises y muchos creen que puede contribuir a los procesos de reforma del modelo de atencion de salud mental en todo el mundo. En el ambito academico, diversas publicaciones han analizado las diferentes formas de aplicar el enfoque a nivel nacional e internacional. El objetivo de esta revision integradora, realizada en 2019, fue analizar como se ha tratado el enfoque de recuperacion en la literatura cientifica en America Latina. El analisis genero categorias tematicas develando los principales temas abordados en estas publicaciones, incluyendo discusiones sobre terminologia, el concepto de recuperacion, practicas, politicas y servicios orientados por la recuperacion y posibilidades de incorporar el enfoque en el contexto de la Reforma Psiquiatrica Brasilena que, a pesar de los obstaculos, todavia puede considerarse como una guia para la Politica Nacional de Salud Mental en Brasil. La revision senala que el numero de publicaciones sobre recuperacion en America Latina es escaso, en comparacion con el numero de publicaciones en Estados Unidos, Canada, Hong Kong, Europa y Oceania, y son principalmente de Brasil. Tambien se advierte que los autores brasilenos, en general, entienden que la recuperacion puede representar una contribucion importante al avance de la Reforma Psiquiatrica Brasilena y algunos defienden la necesidad de ser cautelosos sobre la incorporacion del enfoque sin una adecuada adaptacion a la ubicacion social, cultural y economica. Tambien se senalo que la recuperacion se ha aplicado en otros contextos sociales. EnglishRecovery is an approach to mental health care that emerged in the 1960s and 70s from the United States consumers´ movements, ex-patients and psychiatric survivors. Currently, a number of recovery oriented mental health services operate in various countries. This approach may contribute to the advancement of mental health reforms currently undergoing around the world. The interest manifested in the academic field has led to a number of publications that delineate and analyze diverse aspects of recovery internationally. In order to understand how recovery has been treated in the Latin American literature the authors conducted an integrative review that showed a fruitful scholarly production. However, the number of articles is smaller in Latin America when compared with other countries such as the United States, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and Hong Kong. The review, conducted in 2019, generated thematic categories that allowed mapping the themes that attracted more attention of the Latin American scholars within the scope of recovery and its relations to mental health and alcohol and drug addiction. Most of the articles found were published in Brazil, and most of them admit that recovery can contribute to the advancement of the Brazilian psychiatric reform. Also, it was found that the approach is being considered to be applied to other social contexts. portuguesA abordagem Recovery emergiu nos anos 1970 nos Estados Unidos a partir dos movimentos em defesa dos direitos dos usuarios dos servicos de saude mental, ex-pacientes ou sobreviventes da psiquiatria. A partir da decada de 2000 recovery vem orientando servicos de saude mental em diversos paises e muitos acreditam que possa contribuir com os processos de reforma do modelo de atencao em saude mental em todo o mundo. No campo academico, um numero de publicacoes vem analisando as formas diversas de aplicacao da abordagem em niveis nacionais e internacional. O objetivo desta revisao integrativa, realizada em 2019, foi analisar como a abordagem recovery vem sendo tratada na literatura cientifica na America Latina. A analise gerou categorias tematicas desvelando os principais assuntos abordados nestas publicacoes, entre eles discussoes sobre terminologia, conceito de recovery, praticas, politicas e servicos orientados por recovery e possibilidades da incorporacao da abordagem no contexto da Reforma Psiquiatrica Brasileira que, apesar dos obstaculos, ainda pode ser considerada como orientadora da Politica Nacional de Saude Mental no Brasil. A revisao aponta que o numero de publicacoes sobre recovery na America Latina e escasso, comparado com o numero de publicacoes nos Estados Unidos, Canada, Hong Kong, Europa e Oceania, e sao oriundas principalmente do Brasil. Percebe-se, ainda, que os autores brasileiros, em geral, entendem que recovery pode representar uma importante contribuicao ao avanco da Reforma Psiquiatrica Brasileira e alguns defendem a necessidade de cautela sobre a incorporacao da abordagem sem uma devida adaptacao ao contexto social, cultural e economico local. Tambem foi apontado que recovery tem sido aplicado em outros contextos sociais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.025 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".