MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204277547 · doi:10.7202/1079218ar

Cultures organisationnelles progressistes : leurs effets sur les tensions de rôle et l’obligation ressentie de rendre des comptes

2021· article· fr· W3204277547 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Éric Casenave, Bernard Pras

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Organizational Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceObligationPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse les relations entre les tensions de rôle, l’obligation ressentie de rendre des comptes (ORRC) et les cultures organisationnelles. Une étude menée en France auprès de 167 managers montre que l’ORRC joue un rôle médiateur entre l’ambiguïté de rôle et le conflit de rôle. Les cultures organisationnelles dites « libérées » ou progressistes et les cultures bureaucratiques augmentent respectivement l’effet de l’ambiguïté de rôle sur l’ORRC et celui de l’ORRC sur le conflit de rôle et les demandes contradictoires ou incompatibles. Ces résultats sont affinés en fonction des dimensions de l’ORRC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.014
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicAccounting and Organizational ManagementFrench-language works237,207