Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sarah Kane’s <italic>Blasted</italic> is one of the most controversial plays written and produced by a British playwright over the last quarter century. A defining contribution to a genre of plays which emerged during the 1990s, and which are variously termed ‘in-yer-face’ and ‘new brutalist’. The principle strategy of ‘in-yer-face’ theatre was to shock its audience. Intimating a shared complacency between comfortable middle-class Britain and its comfortable middle-class theatre. A number of ‘in-yer-face’ plays were distinguished by their graphic presentation of extreme violence, commonly sexual. And nowhere was this presentation more explicit than in Kane’s <italic>Blasted</italic>, with successive scenes of rape and sexual abuse. This chapter re-reads Kane’s play in the closer context of familiar, and ongoing, debates regarding the relation of law and gender, and more particularly still the limitations of modern rape ‘law’. It is argued that these limitations are rooted in a series of particular rape ‘myths’. Many of which can be located in Kane’s writing, but which are also challenged by it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".