MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204415161 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v22i12.3882

Analysis of Risk Management Practices of the Oil and Gas Industry in Southeast Texas During Hurricane Harvey

2020· article· en· W3204415161 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural disasterRisk managementNatural gasCitizen journalismPetroleum industryRisk analysis (engineering)Emergency managementBusinessIdentification (biology)Natural gas industryEngineeringEnvironmental planningForensic engineeringEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeographyComputer scienceWaste managementEconomicsEnvironmental engineeringFinanceEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid recovery of the oil and gas sector from natural disasters such as Hurricane Harvey is important for the local economic development of Southeast Texas. The recovery of this industry depends on efficient risk management from natural disasters. In this study Participatory Analysis of Risk Management (PARM) methodology is developed to determine the risk management practices used in recovery and resiliency from natural disasters. The other aim of this tool is to diagnose challenges and use past experiences of local stakeholders to avoid big losses in the future. This comprehensive analysis tool will help to analyze how oil and gas companies do risk identification, assessment, response, and monitoring after natural disasters, to reach reliable conclusions and recommendations. This study describes in detail the PARM methodology and applies it to the oil and gas sector in Southeast Texas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207