MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204536383 · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3116294

Calibration-Free CMOS Capacitive Sensor for Life Science Applications

2021· article· en· W3204536383 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamed Osouli Tabrizi, Saghi Forouhi, Omid Farhanieh, Ayhan Bozkurt, Sebastian Magierowski, Ebrahim Ghafar‐Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsCapacitive sensingCapacitanceCapacitorCMOSParasitic capacitanceCalibrationMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringCapacitance probeOptoelectronicsElectrodeElectronic engineeringEngineeringChemistryPhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CMOS capacitive sensors reported for high accuracy cellular molecular measurements typically suffer from significant parasitic capacitance changes caused by remnants and sediments during the experiment with several biological and chemical reactions. In this paper, we propose a novel calibration-free capacitive sensing system that addresses this problem. The proposed CMOS capacitive sensor includes interdigitated electrodes (IDEs), a capacitance-to-current converter with a wide input dynamic range (IDR), a variable reference capacitor, and an oscillator-based analog-to-digital converter (ADC) which has been fabricated using 0.35 μm AMS CMOS process. Sweeping the value of the variable reference capacitor from 0.1 fF up to 1.27 pF with a step of 10 fF and repeating the sweep each second during the experiment allows the creation of time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) fingerprints for the measurement of capacitance variations of the sample-electrode interface resulted from both the target material as well as non-target parasitic capacitances. We have tested the sensor using three different chemical solvents. The four different categories of curves that constitute the fingerprints of the chemicals showed a match with the post-layout simulation results. Capacitance change in the range of 0.416 fF up to 1.27 pF can practically be monitored. The electrode area of 110 μm by 220 μm and the micrometer chamber size allows for placing tiny droplets of a few microliters. The generated fingerprint is valid for the chemicals with a conductivity of up to 5 mS/cm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207