Quantum transfer through small networks coupled to phonons: Effects of topology versus phonons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Particle or energy transfer through quantum networks is determined by network topology and couplings to environments. This study examines the combined effect of topology and external couplings on the efficiency of directional quantum transfer through quantum networks. We consider a microscopic model of qubit networks coupled to external vibrations by Holstein and Peierls couplings. By treating the positions of the network sites and the site-dependent phonon frequencies as independent variables, we determine the Hamiltonian parameters corresponding to minimum transfer time by Bayesian optimization. The results show that Holstein couplings may accelerate transfer through suboptimal network configurations but cannot accelerate quantum dynamics beyond the limit of the transfer time in an optimal phonon-free configuration. By contrast, Peierls couplings distort the optimal networks to accelerate quantum transfer through configurations with less than six sites. However, the speed-up offered by Peierls couplings decreases with the network size and disappears for networks with more than seven sites. For networks with seven sites or more, Peierls couplings distort the optimal network configurations and change the mechanism of quantum transfer but do not affect the lower limit of the transfer time. The machine-learning approach demonstrated here can be applied to determine quantum speed limits in other applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".