Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability in the Salter Classification of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a concerning complication that can result from treatments for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). AVN can lead to degenerative osteoarthritis, persistent acetabular dysplasia, reduced function, and continuing hip pain. The incidence of AVN reported in the DDH literature is widely varied (0% to 73%). This variability may arise from lack of consensus on what constitutes true AVN in this patient population, and lack of clear criteria provided in studies reporting incidence rates. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective database of infants diagnosed with DDH between 2010 and 2014 from 0 to 18 months of age was analyzed for patients treated by closed reduction (CR). Twelve pediatric orthopaedic surgeons completed 2 rounds of AVN assessments. Deidentified anteroposterior radiographs at most recent follow-up were provided to surgeons along with patient age at radiographic assessment, length of follow-up, ands affected hip. Ten of 12 surgeons completed a third round of assessments where they were provided with 1 to 2 additional radiographs within the follow-up period. Radiographic criteria for total AVN described by Salter and colleagues were used. Surgeons rated the presence of AVN as "yes" or "no" and kappa values were calculated within and between rounds. RESULTS: A total of 69 hips in 60 patients were assessed for AVN a median of 22 months (range: 12 to 36) post-CR. Interobserver kappa values for rounds 1, 2, and 3 were 0.52 (range: 0.11 to 0.90), 0.61 (range: 0.21 to 0.90), and 0.53 (range: 0.10 to 0.79), respectively. Intraobserver agreement for AVN diagnosis was an average of 0.72 (range: 0.31 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Despite using the most commonly referenced diagnostic criteria, radiographic diagnosis of AVN following CR in DDH patients demonstrated only moderate agreement across surgeons. The addition of sequential radiographs did not improve cross-observer reliability, and while substantial agreement was seen within observers, the range of intraobserver kappa values was large. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-diagnostic study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.057 | 0.098 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".