Étude des tensions au sein de la cellule familiale dans l’œuvre de Ying Chen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors que les premiers romans de l’auteure sino-canadienne Ying Chen pouvaient aisément être rattachés à l’écriture migrante, ses dernières publications s’inscrivent moins clairement dans ce corpus. Pourtant, la critique les aborde encore généralement à partir de cette perspective. La présente étude a pour but d’analyser les romans de Chen qui mettent en scène la « même » narratrice anonyme à partir d’une approche plus appropriée, c’est-à-dire le thème de la cellule familiale. Les écrits féministes sur le rôle de la femme dans la société patriarcale ainsi que ceux sur le récit de filiation façonnent le regard porté sur les tensions au sein de la famille au fil de cette analyse. Le corpus à l’étude se compose du roman Immobile, qui met en scène une femme rejetant la filiation au profit d’ancêtres imaginaires, Le Mangeur qui se concentre sur une paternité étouffante et Un enfant à ma porte qui relate l’échec de la maternité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".