Fragility profile of elderly care in primary health care / Perfil de fragilidade de idosos atendidos na atenção primária à saúde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: avaliar a prevalência e os graus da fragilidade em idosos atendidos na Atenção Primária à Saúde, através da Edmonton Frail Scale. Método: os dados foram obtidos por meio de um questionário previamente elaborado. Excetuando-se as perdas e recusas amostrais, participaram do estudo 118 idosos. A coleta de dados foi realizada na Unidade Básica de Saúde ou no domicílio dos idosos. Resultados: obteve-se predominância de pessoas do sexo feminino (72%), a idade média foi de aproximadamente 71,55 anos. No tocante a fragilidade de forma geral, 28% (n=3) dos entrevistados obtiveram escores comuns à fragilidade, 32,2% (n=38) foram considerados aparentemente vulneráveis e 39,8% (n=47) não frágeis. Conclusão: considerando as alterações que o idoso fragilizado pode enfrentar com o avanço desse problema, são necessárias intervenções precoces, as quais a Atenção Primária à Saúde é capaz de priorizar, contudo são necessários estudos maiores para avaliarem variáveis relacionadas à fragilidade em diferentes realidades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".