MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204651971 · doi:10.18280/ts.380401

Respiratory and Motion Artefacts Removal from ICG Signal Using Denoising Techniques for Hemodynamic Parameters Monitoring

2021· article· en· W3204651971 on OpenAlex
Hadjer Benabdallah, Salim Kerai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirection Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique
KeywordsNoise reductionSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceMotion (physics)HemodynamicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impedance cardiography (ICG) is a reliable, non-invasive method widely used in clinical practice for the measurement of a multitude of hemodynamic parameters for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and continuous monitoring.Signal processing field is necessary to eliminate noises as an artefact of respiration and movement, to extract features characteristics from ICG signals.This paper discusses the concept of wavelet denoising based on scale-dependent thresholding, which is used in two types of the orthogonal wavelet family: Daubechies wavelets (db) and Symlet (sym) applied to the ICG.The study is based on wavelet coefficients that are thresholded using Sureshrink, NeighBlock, and classical thresholds such as Rigrsure and Sqtwolog; they are all compared with linear filters as well as with the LMS-based adaptive filtering algorithm already implemented in biosignal denoising.The results of the evaluation of the performance parameters show that the best denoising technique that gives good results in noise reduction is that of sym8 wavelets at level 5, and the most optimal thresholding technique is the Rigrsure technique with a mean error rate (MER) equal to 0.0001%.The proposed method has shown the reliability of results that can help us later to extract precisely significant information to diagnose earlier and monitor cardiovascular disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it