MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3204671297 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-485

Variability of the circulation in the western North Atlantic and its impact on deep-water oxygen concentrations in the St. Lawrence Estuary on the western continental shelf: evidence from observations

2021· article· en· W3204671297 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mathilde Jutras, Carolina O. Dufour, Alfonso Mucci, Frédéric Cyr, Denis Gilbert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversité du Québec à MontréalMemorial University of NewfoundlandMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyEstuaryBiogeochemical cycleContinental shelfGulf StreamEnvironmental scienceEutrophicationDeoxygenationGeologyEcologyChemistryNutrientBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxygen concentrations in the deep waters of the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary, in eastern Canada, have decreased by 50% over the past century, reaching hypoxic levels. To study the causes of this deoxygenation, we applied a mixing model (an extended multi-parameter analysis - eOMP) to data collected in the St. Lawrence Estuary since the 1970s and from the late 1990s to 2018. This method accounts for diapycnal mixing and can distinguish between the physical and biogeochemical causes of deoxygenation. The eOMP reveals that, in recent years, most of the deoxygenation of deep waters of the St. Lawrence Estuary is due to a change in the circulation pattern in the western North Atlantic. Since 2008, the Slope Sea and the deep waters of the St. Lawrence Estuary are fed by an increasing amount of oxygen-poor North Atlantic Central Waters (NACW), transported by the Gulf Stream, at the expense of oxygen-rich Labrador Current Waters (LCW). The oxygenation level of the St. Lawrence Estuary therefore reflects what is happening in the western North Atlantic. In contrast, the eOMP shows that, from the 1970s to the late 1990s, biogeochemical changes such as local eutrophication and variations in oxygen consumption rates in the North Atlantic dominated the deoxygenation. Further analyses suggest that the variability in the LCW:NACW ratio in the Slope Waters is mainly controlled by the Scotian Shelf-break Current, an extension of the Labrador Current, and not by the position or strength of the Gulf Stream, as often suggested. When the Labrador Current is strong, little of the southward flowing Labrador Current waters follow the coast all the way to the Scotian Shelf, and most of these waters are deviated east towards the North Atlantic. The opposite is true when the Labrador Current is weak. We will present some analysis of LCW trajectories in different conditions and discuss their potential drivers, based on a high resolution model. Overall, our results highlight the primary role of the Labrador Current in determining (i) the oxygen concentration and other water properties on the western North Atlantic continental shelf and slope, and (ii) the advection of fresh Labrador Current Water into the subpolar North Atlantic, with possible implications on the thermohaline and gyre circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→