Molecular Subgroup Is the Strongest Predictor of Medulloblastoma Outcome in a Resource-Limited Country
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE Medulloblastoma is composed of four clinically and prognostically distinct molecular subgroups (WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4). However, the clinical implications of these subgroups in the context of the unique challenges of low- to middle-income countries are rarely reported. METHODS We assembled an institutional cohort of children (3-18 years) diagnosed with medulloblastoma and treated in Jordan between 2003 and 2016. Tumors were subgrouped by NanoString and correlated with clinical and radiologic characteristics. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients were identified (63% male); median age was 6.9 years (interquartile range 4.8-9.2) and median symptom duration was 6 weeks (interquartile range 4-11). Radiotherapy was implemented as standard-risk in 41 patients (47%) and high-risk in 47 patients (53%). Subgrouping revealed 17 WNT (19%), 22 SHH (25%), 21 group 3 (24%), and 28 group 4 tumors (32%). Median time between craniotomy and radiotherapy was 45 days (17-155); 44% of them > 49 days. Median duration of radiotherapy was 44 days (36-74). Seventy-two patients (82%) received chemotherapy afterward. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (0.2-14.9), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 73.5% and 69.4%, respectively, with no statistically significant survival difference between standard-risk and high-risk patients. Metastasis was significant for overall survival ( P = .011). Patients with SHH and group 4 tumors had very good PFS (83.4% and 87.0%, respectively) and those with group 3 tumors had dismal outcomes (PFS 44.9%), whereas WNT tumors had less-than expected PFS (70.5%). PFS was statistically significant in patients with nonmetastatic tumors receiving radiotherapy ≤ 49 days ( P = .011), particularly group 3 tumors. CONCLUSION Patients with SHH and group 4 medulloblastoma had excellent survival comparable with high-income countries. Compliance with treatment protocols and avoiding radiotherapy delays are important in achieving adequate survival in low- to middle-income country settings. Subgroup-driven treatment protocols should be considered in countries with limited resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".