MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High Efficiency Raman Soliton Generation in Passive Silica Fiber

2021· article· en· W3204701723 on OpenAlexaff
Md Hosne Mobarok Shamim, Imtiaz Alamgir, Martin Rochette

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFiber laserFemtosecondOptoelectronicsOpticsFiberLaserDispersion-shifted fiberOptical fiberThuliumDispersion (optics)Energy conversion efficiencyPhotonic-crystal fiberZero-dispersion wavelengthAmplifierWavelengthDopingFiber optic sensorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsed laser sources in the spectral window of 2 μm find many applications in engineering and science [1] . Thulium doped fiber lasers (TDFL) are especially attractive for this purpose with their emission in the 1.8-2.1 µm spectral range. The emission spectrum of a TDFL beyond 2.1 µm is also attainable with nonlinear approaches such as soliton self-frequency shift (SSFS) [2] , [3] . Previously, TDFL systems using SSFS have been demonstrated from thulium-doped fiber amplifiers (TDFA) pumped by tens of watts of continuous wave signal, leading to high-power femtosecond pulses (~100 kW, ~100 fs) [4] , [5] . However, such high-power systems are bulky and require external cooling mechanisms, as well as they lead to SSFS for a specific wavelength and pulse intensity. On the other hand, reports of TDFL with SSFS from passive fibers such as Ge-doped fibers require custom-made dispersion engineered fibers [6] . Here, we present a simple, all-fiber system that extends the wavelength reach of a TDFL from a passive, commercially available silica fiber. The system is tunable over 310 nm with an energy conversion efficiency up to 84.6%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest energy conversion efficiency ever reported in any SSFS system based on a passive fiber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207