MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204711336 · doi:10.37382/sinite.v62i187.481

Los laicos en una Iglesia sinodal

2021· article· es· W3204711336 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Pablo García Maestro

Bibliographic record

VenueSinite · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsMonsanto (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tres son los aspectos que reavivan la sinodalidad: en primer lugar, la escucha, es decir, la sensibilidad y la apertura a las opiniones de los otros; escuchar es tanto más importante cuanto más se asciende en la jerarquía. El segundo aspecto es la corresponsabilidad, porque el caminar juntos no puede acaecer sin la corrección fraterna que purifica a la Iglesia de los errores y la hace avanzar. El tercer aspecto es la participación de los laicos que, como miembros de pleno derecho de la Iglesia, están llamados a expresarse y a hacer sugerencias. No solo deben ser acogidos, también deber ser escuchados. Este es el rumbo marcado por el Concilio Vaticano II, pero todavía poco seguido.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSiniteSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207