Quantifying the Impact of Inspection Processes on Production Lines through Stochastic Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspection processes are becoming more and more popular beyond the manufacturing industry to ensure product quality. Implementing inspection systems in multistage production lines brings many benefits in productivity, quality, and customer satisfaction. However, quantifying the changes necessary to adapt the production to these systems is analytically complicated, and the tools available lack the flexibility to visualize all the inspection strategies available. This paper proposed a discrete-event simulation model that relies on probabilistic defect propagation to quantify the impact on productivity, quality, and material supply at the introduction of inspection processes in a multistage production line. The quantification follows lean manufacturing principles, providing from quite basic quantity and time elements to more comprehensive key performance indicators. The flexibility of discrete-event simulation allows for customized manufacturing and inspection topologies and variability in the tasks and inspection systems used. The model is validated in two common manufacturing scenarios, and the method to analyze the cost-effectiveness of implementing inspection processes is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it