Concept de monotonicité et distribution du subjonctif : Interface entre morphosyntaxe et sémantique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but du present article est de postuler Pexistence d’une interface entre morphosyntaxe et semantique afin d'expliquer l'acquisition de la distribution modale en espagnol. Pour ce faire, nous donnons un bref apercu de ce qu’est le concept de monotonicite, nous exposons le parallele entre distribution du subjonctif et distribution des termes de polarite negative (TPN) et nous identifions trois criteres a prendre en consideration lors de l ’evaluation d’enonces monotoniques decroissants (section 2). Nous presentons ensuite une hierarchie des TPN et des operateurs affectifs qui autorisent la distribution de ces derniers (section 3). Nous terminons par expliquer en quoi l'acquisition de la distribution modale en espagnol resulterait d’une interface entre morphosyntaxe et semantique (section 4). En dernier lieu, nous resumons les principaux points de notre article (section 5).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".