Statûya Zimên û Polîtîkayên Partîyan li Kurdistana Iraqê. Mînakên Guhertoyên Behdînî û Hewramî
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ev xebat statûya du guhertoyên zimanî yên Kurdistana Iraqê dide ber hev: Behdînî û Hewramî. Hikumeta Heremî ya Kurdistanê (HHK) herdu guhertoyan wekî guhertoyên Kurdî dibîne. Lê, herçiqas herdu guhertoyan ji bo perwerdeya bi zimanê zikmakî û naskirina resmî hewl dabin jî, tenê Behdînî karîye mafên zimên bi dest bixe. Ji bo lêkolîna sedemêm muhtemel yên newekhevîya statûya van herdu guhertoyan, vê xebatê polîtîkaya krîtîk ya zimên (critical language policy) û nêrîna dîrokî ya sazûmanî (historical construction approach) bi kar anîne. Vê gotarê ev herdu guherto ji çend alîyan ve dane ber hev: wekî zimannasî, pêvajoya pêşketina dîrokî, kevneşopîya nivîskî, têgihîştin û tevger, mobîlîzasyona etnozimanî, demografî û rewşa sosyo-ekonomîk, û wekî dawî sîyaset û hêza sîyasî ya civatan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".