Le Canadien français d’Horace Mitchell Miner dans <i>St. Denis: A French-Canadian Parish</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’universitaire américain Horace Mitchell Miner qui publie en 1939, aux Presses de l’Université de Chicago, St. Denis: A French-Canadian Parish, propose une étude sur les mœurs des Canadiens français de manière à expliquer les forces qui président aux mutations que connaissent les sociétés. Miner inscrit son analyse dans les débats qui existent alors aux États-Unis concernant la nature des conséquences que provoquent le développement industriel sur les interactions humaines. Le passage d’une communauté paysanne à une société beaucoup plus complexe produirait une série de modifications significatives sur les rapports sociaux. En tant que dernier village paysan de l’Amérique du Nord, comme l’écrit Miner dans son étude, l’analyse de la communauté canadienne-française permet de faire le portrait d’un univers archaïque en voie de disparition. Cet article cherche à comprendre la manière dont Miner rend compte des mœurs des Canadiens français et pourquoi ils sont perçus comme fondamentalement en marge de la norme américaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".