Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Willingness to communicate (WTC) is a psychological construct that was originally postulated by US communication researchers but that thrived in second language acquisition (SLA) research. This chapter presents the definition of this construct as used in communication and SLA studies. It discusses implications for practice and future directions for research, leading up to reflection questions and recommended readings. In SLA, social psychological research, which started in the 1960s in Canada, highlighted attitudes toward an second language (L2) community and motivation to learn the language to communicate with the L2 group. L2 WTC research conducted across cultural contexts often raises additional factors that may influence WTC and that researchers found relevant in each context. Thus, many methods have been employed to capture the nature of L2 WTC. WTC should be a goal of L2 instruction not only because it has the potential to trigger acquisition but also because it motivates people to take part in intergroup relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it